[For he had a vow] …. The most remarkable vow among
the Jews was that of the Nazarite, by which a man made a solemn promise to God
to abstain from wine, and from all intoxicating liquors, to let the hair grow,
not to enter any house polluted by having a dead body in it, or to attend any
funeral. This vow generally lasted eight days, sometimes a month, sometimes
during a definite period fixed by themselves, and sometimes during their whole
lives…. Those who made the vow out of Palestine, and who could not come to the
temple when the vow was expired, contented themselves with observing the
abstinence required by the Law, and cutting off the hair where they were. This
I suppose to have been the case with Paul. His hair he cut off at the
expiration of the vow at Cenchrea, though he delayed to perfect the vow by the
proper ceremonies until he reached Jerusalem, Acts 21:23-24. (from
Barnes' Notes, Electronic Database. Copyright (c) 1997 by Biblesoft)
"So Paul still remained a good while. Then he took leave of the brethren and sailed for Syria, and Priscilla and Aquila were with him. He had his hair cut off at Cenchrea, for he had taken a vow" (Acts 18:18). The shaving of the head in connection with
a vow is following the custom of the Nazirite vow (Numbers 6:2-21). The Bible doesn't record why he chose to follow the Jewish practice for this particular vow, though we can make a reasonable guess. He stated he was heading to Jerusalem and wanted to be there in time for a particular feast (Acts 18:21). Paul was well known in the Jewish circles as one who had abandoned their faith and had become a Christian. By following the custom of this vow, Paul was showing everyone that he had not changed that much and it would provide an opportunity for him to talk to his brethren about the Christ. It was not that Paul thought that shaving the head was required for a vow. He saw it as something that made no difference and so it would do no harm to follow the custom and it would open doors of opportunity that he would not have otherwise.
Even though he kept one part of the Nazirite vow, he would not have followed this type of vow completely. Along with the shaving of his head, the vow required abstaining from all grape products. As a Christian, Paul would not have done this if the vow lasted longer than a week because he would partake of the Lord's Supper on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7); that supper includes the fruit of the vine (grape juice).
He was later encouraged to do something similar for the same purpose. "And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord. And they said to him, "You see, brother, how many myriads of Jews there are who have believed, and they are all zealous for the law; but they have been informed about you that you teach all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children nor to walk according to the customs. What then? The assembly must certainly meet, for they will hear that you have come. Therefore do what we tell you: We have four men who have taken a vow. Take them and be purified with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads, and that all may know that those things of which they were informed concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the law. But concerning the Gentiles who believe, we have written and decided that they should observe no such thing, except that they should keep themselves from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality." Then Paul took the men, and the next day, having been purified with them, entered the temple to announce the expiration of the days of purification, at which time an offering should be made for each one of them" (Acts 21:20-26). Notice that the suggestion for observing the vow was not to bind the Old Law. It was clearly stated, "But concerning the Gentiles who believe, we have written and decided they should observe no such thing ..." This was merely a way for Paul to demonstrate that he wasn't the Jews' enemy. Following this practice did not break Christian principles, so long was it was not taught as being binding on all Christians (which it was not), so Paul used it as a means of gaining the acceptance of the Jews so that he could teach them.
"For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law; to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those who are without law; to the weak I became as weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some" (I Corinthians 9:19-22).
It didn't work in this case, but I want you to notice the charge that was laid against Paul: "Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this place; and furthermore he also brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place" (Acts 21:28). Though Paul did not break the law as they had charged, still people knew that Paul taught against following the law; that is why it was so easy to get the crowd to imagine that he had broke the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, kindly Read, Comment and Share.
How To comment:
1. Type your comment inside the comment box.
2. Go to "COMMENT AS" and choose one profile from the drop-down box(You can use ANONYMOUS if you like)
3. Lastly, click PUBLISH